Favoring hardware raid over software raid comes from a time. How does zfs raidz compare to its corresponding traditional raid when it comes to data. For production data we use mirrors because its usually serving vm images and we need the maximum performance we can get with reliability. It is used to improve disk io performance and reliability of your server or workstation. Mar 22, 2016 zfs vs hardware raid due to the need of upgrading our storage space and the fact that we have in our machines 2 raid controllers, one for the internal disks and one for the external disks, the possibility to use a software raid instead of a traditional hardware based raid was tested. Zfs best practices with hardware raid server fault. Research before you make that change, as windows wont be bootable afterwards there are ways around it with certain oss per my colleague but i have not seen it. Zfs basically incorporates software raid, volume mananger and filesystem into a complete solution and if you want to use hardware raid you are better of with another filesystem. Before raid was raid, software disk mirroring raid 1 was a huge profit generator for system vendors, who sold it as an addon to their operating systems. Whether software raid vs hardware raid is the one for you depends on what you need to do and how much you want to pay. The two disks are then combined into a software raid 1 using freebsd gmirror.
Jun, 2016 comparing hardware raid vs software raid setups deals with how the storage drives in a raid array connect to the motherboard in a server or pc, and the management of those drives. This is also true for many hardware based raid solutions. Imho, im a big fan of kernel developers non directly related to zfs, so i really prefere mdadm to hardware raid. Using zfs with the disks directly will allow it to obtain the sector size information reported by the disks to avoid readmodifywrite on.
Dec 25, 20 i keep reading that using raid z3 has performance impacts vs raid z2 or raid z, but i cannot figure out why. Nov 11, 2016 in conclusion, i feel better with not using hardware raid. Windows software raid vs hardware raid ars technica. A hardware raid controller configured for raid 1, presenting a single volume to the os, with zfs only seeing it as a single disk. Its more like running zfs on a hardware raid, which is redundant.
Windows home server v1s drive extender was not a raid 1 implementation, but it utilize the cpu to make stored data. Thisd then be set up as a network share for a remote jirabitbucket store, and also vm storage for my xen boxes. The zfs tuningadmin guide has more details about the differences. A brief history of raid raid has been around since 1970s 1989 berkeley paper was a taxonomy 1989 witnessed the first raid5 in software 1990s saw many hardware raid3, 5s lsi, 3ware, maxstrat, highpoint, intel 1990s also saw the introduction of raidframe mdraid came along in 2001. Zfs has a selfhealing mechanism which only works if redundancy is performed by zfs. A raid 1 will write in the same time the data to both disks taking twice as long as a raid 0, but can, in theory read twice as fast, because will read from one disk a part of the data and from another the other part, so raid 1 is not twice as bad as raid 0, both have their place. When looking at the mails and comments i get about my zfs optimization and my raidgreed posts, the same type of questions tend to pop up over and over again. Aug 15, 2006 over at home opensolaris forums zfs discuss robert milkowski has posted some promising test results hard vs. Zfs software raid part iii this time i wanted to test softare raid10 vs. Hardware raid 5e vs 6 vs 10 for home media server hardforum. Favoring hardware raid over software raid comes from a time when hardware was just not powerful enough to handle software raid processing, along with all the other tasks that it was being used for. Why use an extra dedicated processor when your fileservers have very powerful processors already in them.
Oct 10, 2008 zfs equally as mobile between solaris, opensolaris, freebsd, osx, and linux under fuse. It uses hardware raid controller card that handles the raid tasks transparently to the operating system. Even if you dont go with one of the fancier software controllers like zfs or btrfs id still recommend going with a software raid. Common incarnations of software raid would include the oracle sun zfs, linuxs mdadm, flexraid, drobo beyondraid, lime technologys unraid, windows dynamic disk basedraid functionality, netapps raiddp, and etc. Zfs on linux vs windows storage spaces with refs brismuths. They are functionally identical to normal raid levels, with the only minor differences coming from zfs s increased resiliency due to the nature of its architecture. The following sections look at the different implementations, the strengths and weaknesses and their impact to system performance and effectiveness in enhancing data availability. With five disks and 3 parity, it would seem that the zfs software would calculate the parity almost instantly and then write them all out at once. Zfs works around write hole by embracing the complexity. Over at home opensolaris forums zfs discuss robert milkowski has posted some promising test results hard vs.
Hardware raid controllers mitigate the write hole problem by using battery backup. You have a lowly d525 at your disposal, which is a decent enough little cpu for serving media etc, but its not going to win you any medals performing lots of xor calcs, so offloading that to a hardware solution such as an adaptec card is prolly a good idea. To understand why using zfs may cost you extra money, we will dig a little bit into zfs. An important piece of that puzzle was eliminating the expensive raid card used in traditional storage and replacing it with high performance, software raid. I was initially considering a zfs software raid but after reading the minimum requirements it does not sound like zfs will be able to saturate a gigabit line with an amd e450 processor 1. Zfs equally as mobile between solaris, opensolaris, freebsd, osx, and linux under fuse. The zfs file system allows you to configure different raid levels such as raid 0, 1, 10, 5, 6. Nov 15, 2019 this raid technology comes in three flavors. If you want to set the controller to ahci, be aware it will affect your windows install. I was reading about zfs on your blog and you mention that if i do a 6 drive array for example, and a single raid z the speed of the slowest drive is the maximum i will be able to achieve, now i. Hardware raid 1 is more likely to experience readmodifywrite overhead from partial sector writes and hardware raid 56 will almost certainty suffer from partial stripe writes i. Ease of configuration zfs has been built into ubuntu starting with 16.
Also, with a hardware raid solution, the raid controller becomes a singlepointoffailure. In a hardware raid setup, the drives connect to a special raid controller inserted in a fast pciexpress pcie slot in a motherboard. A raid can be deployed using both software and hardware. Zfs is also much faster at raid z that windows is at software raid5. Softwarehardware raid 1 as previously mentioned doesnt matter. However some cheaper raid cards have poor performance when. As for the hardware vs software raid question, adaptec raid cards are good at what they do. For this test, i arranged two quite old hp dl380 g2 2x 1. Hardware raid is still popular with some people and many of todays hardware raid cards offer kickass performance. I was reading about zfs on your blog and you mention that if i do a 6 drive array for example, and a single raidz the speed of the slowest drive is the maximum i will be able to achieve, now i. Jul 07, 2009 a redundant array of inexpensive disks raid allows high levels of storage reliability. So, what are the actual advantages of software raid when compared to hardware raid when you ignore cost and performance. Freebsds gmirror and zfs are great, but up until now its been a.
My main tests are mainly based on freebsd and centos linux kernel v3. It can either be performed in the host servers cpu software raid, or in an external cpu hardware raid. As far as i know, zfs on linux doesnt like kernel v4 which is what fedora mainly uses. Mar 14, 2019 difference between software raid and hardware raid in high level is presented in this video session. Hardware raid will cost more, but it will also be free of software raids. A redundant array of inexpensive disks raid allows high levels of storage reliability. Soft possibly the longest running battle in raid circles is which is faster, hardware raid or software raid. Apr 05, 2019 favoring hardware raid over software raid comes from a time when hardware was just not powerful enough to handle software raid processing, along with all the other tasks that it was being used for. Also, by hardware raid, i mean the notfake raid variety. Software hardware raid 1 as previously mentioned doesnt matter. Sep 09, 2012 yes, zfs raid instead of hardware raid. Hardware raid will cost more, but it will also be free of software raid s. Zfs has its own names for its software raid implementations. I would give zfs a slight performance edge, but only because the question really comes down to hw raid battery backed cache vs zfs l2arczil.
On native platforms not linux solaris is faster that ntfs. Raid 1 vs backup and software raid 1 vs hardware raid 1 h. Is my data really safer on zfs, or is hardware raid just as good at maintaining the integrity of the data. How good is a zfs raid 50s performance in comparison with. They are functionally identical to normal raid levels, with the only minor differences coming from zfss increased resiliency due to the nature of its architecture. Other software raid solutions like linux mdadm lets you grow an existing raid array with one disk at a time.
For discussion of performance, disk space usage, maintenance and stuff you. You wont get the performance that a zfs raidz with sufficient ram would offer, but you probably dont need that kind of performance for a home file server anyway. This is also true for many hardwarebased raid solutions. Zfs is also much faster at raidz that windows is at software raid5. Lets start the hardware vs software raid battle with the hardware side.
Had some teething troubles when first setting up zfs, and some minor ongoing issues like mp3s skipping if im doing heavy copying seems to be due to excessive cpu load on my nas but. In conclusion, i feel better with not using hardware raid. Mar 06, 2018 it can either be performed in the host servers cpu software raid, or in an external cpu hardware raid. Which is why i like hardware raid 10 and software parity raid with zfs on top either way.
Differences between hardware raid, hbas, and software raid. Nov 04, 2010 the zfs file system allows you to configure different raid levels such as raid 0, 1, 10, 5, 6. I used x4100 server with dualported 4gb qlogic hba directly connected to emc clariion cx340 array both links, each link connected to different storage processor. Difference between software raid and hardware raid in high level is presented in this video session.
This is ideal for home users because you can expand as you need. Again if your only desire to use zfs is an improvement in data resiliency, and your chosen hardware platform requires a raid card provide a single lun to zfs or multiple luns, but you have zfs stripe across them, then youre doing nothing to improve data resiliency and thus your choice of zfs may not be appropriate. Zfs has two tools zpool and zfs to manage devices, raid, pools and filesystems from the operating system level. The more interesting option is to use some of my old hardware lying around to put together a storage machine either using a hardware raid controller or sata controller using zfs for raid 10 or whatever the zfs equivalent is. Back then, the solution was to use a hardware raid card with a builtin processor that handled the raid calculations offline.
So upgrades and handling failures becomes trivial since the software controller can come with you to the new hardware. When looking at the mails and comments i get about my zfs optimization and my raid greed posts, the same type of questions tend to pop up over and over again. On our backup servers we use raidz2 and the performance is quite good but we have a lot of disks, usually 4x24 per cluster. These results today were rather mixed, but keep in mind this was just looking at the outofthebox performance for each of these linux raid implementations across four consumer grade.
A hardware raid controller configured for two raid 0s. Again if your only desire to use zfs is an improvement in data resiliency, and your chosen hardware platform requires a raid card provide a single lun to zfs or multiple luns, but you have zfs stripe across them, then youre doing nothing to improve data resiliency and thus your choice of. In these tests we used zfs in one of the following configurations. I was wondering if their would be a significant performance increase going with raidz software based as opposed to raid5 hardware based. But the real question is whether you should use a hardware raid solution or a software raid solution. If you need more disk ports you can always get an hba host bus adapter card. As we can clearly see, the performance of the hardware raid controller is a little better than the software raid. While battery power protects against power outage, os or firmware crash is no less damaging. This article outlines what every relevant raid level does, and what its equivalent would be inside zfs. While some hardware raid cards may have a passthrough or jbod mode that simply presents each disk to zfs, the combination of the potential masking of s.
I would definitely check the bios and disable the optane cache. Dec 10, 2018 ive gone completely away from hardware raid. But you can use the lvm and fs features on top of hardware raid perfectly well too. Jul 04, 2019 hardware raid controllers mitigate the write hole problem by using battery backup. Hardware raid vs software raid hindi kshitij kumar youtube. Comparing hardware raid vs software raid setups deals with how the storage drives in a raid array connect to the motherboard in a server or pc, and the management of those drives. I will be setting up a new server with a minimum of 4 hard drives in raid 5 mode and will be encrypting all the drives with geli.
Zfs vs hardware raid due to the need of upgrading our storage space and the fact that we have in our machines 2 raid controllers, one for the internal disks and one for the external disks, the possibility to use a software raid instead of a traditional hardware based raid was tested. I keep reading that using raidz3 has performance impacts vs raidz2 or raidz, but i cannot figure out why. I manage all my bulk storage using zfs similar to storage spaces, and it makes me feel comfortable knowing that i. On our backup servers we use raid z2 and the performance is quite good but we have a lot of disks, usually 4x24 per cluster. Hardware raid handles its arrays independently from the host and it still presents the host with a single disk per raid array. I guess, there are even workloadscircumstances which might lead me to deploy a hardware controller zfs needs a certain level of knowledge, cant demand this from every customer. Zfs vs hardware raid vs software raid vs anything else. Also, by hardware raid, i mean the notfakeraid variety. In a hardware raid setup, the drives connect to a raid controller card inserted in a fast pciexpress pcie slot in a motherboard. This way you can easy replace devices if they are hot swappable, manage new pools and so on. Software vs hardware raid performance and cache usage server.
1113 126 223 377 1488 339 1521 1119 715 453 1395 52 1232 1038 1517 177 1203 1062 197 1355 1364 272 224 1136 1464 1366 734 291 597 1126 1107 251 1391 127 1169 1140 947 285 558 544 644 279